Minimize the damage caused by common mode noise.
by Jay Marchi
January 15, 2016

According to the U.S. National Electric Code NFPA70, Article 100B, an effectively grounded scheme is one that is intentionally connected to earth through a ground connection or connections of sufficiently low impedance and that has sufficient current-carrying capacity to prevent the buildup of voltages that may result in undue hazard to connected equipment or to persons.

Grounding of a non-linear drive system is done for two basic reasons: safety and common mode noise containment or reduction. With the advent of power electronics used in products ranging from personal computers to variable frequency drives (VFDs), harmonic noise containment has become even more important.

Grounding Systems

A good grounding system is an integral part of any electrical system. Older, linear systems were designed around the linear relationships between voltage and current. However, the proliferation of solid-state power supplies that take in incoming alternating current (AC) power, rectify it to direct current (DC), then reconstitute it at varying voltage and current ratios at different frequencies, called nonlinear systems, presents some new challenges for a typical ground scheme. The byproducts of these nonlinear systems are the production of significant harmonic distortions, voltages and currents on a system and, when referenced to ground, are described as common mode noise (CMN). CMN can have deleterious effects on some mechanical components such as bearings and electrical and control systems on the same ground bus.

Figure 1. Comparison of the sinusoidal current wave output of BJT (top) vs IGBT output (Graphics courtesy of ProPump Services)Figure 1. Comparison of the sinusoidal current wave output of BJT (top) vs IGBT output (Graphics courtesy of ProPump Services)
Figure 2. General schematic of a PWM VFD driveFigure 2. General schematic of a PWM VFD drive

VFDs are becoming more common in pumping systems. They offer a means of controlling pump output more efficiently by controlling the operating speed of the electric motor driving the pump. Before VFD technologies, matching pump speed to system load conditions was accomplished using turbines, fluid couplings, multi-ratio gearboxes or variable speed combustion engines.

These reliable methods are still in use. But with the growing emphasis on improving operating efficiency, the inherent inefficiency of traditional methods is driving users toward VFDs. Because the head and flow rate of the pump can be regulated by controlling its rotating speed, the VFD controlling the drive motor speed gives operators a wider operating range, allowing the tailoring of the pump's output to the system's requirements, which can increase the system's overall pumping efficiency.

The VFD Evolution

Developed by Nikola Tesla in 1924, the induction motor can be directly connected to an AC three-phase power source. The motor speed is directly proportional to the applied frequency. For example, a two-pole pair motor with no load operating on a 60-Hertz (Hz) system would rotate at 3,600 revolutions per minute (rpm). However, the same two-pole motor operating on a 50-Hz system would rotate at 3,000 rpm. Therefore, by controlling the frequency of the supplied power to the motor, the motor's speed can be controlled.

Traditionally, the frequency of the power system is determined by the speed of the generator and number of pole pairs. Like the motor, a two-pole pair generator operating at 3,600 rpm will produce AC power at a frequency of 60 Hz. Operating the same generator at 3,000 rpm will cause the output power to oscillate at 50 Hz. To change the power supply frequency, the speed of the generator must be changed.

Until 1968, when Danfoss introduced their VLT5 frequency converter, the most widely used method of providing an AC induction motor with variable frequency was using a speed-controlled DC motor turning an AC generator to produce the desired AC frequencies. Although this system is effective enough to control the speed of the motor within a few rpm, it is expensive to operate and has inherent inefficiencies. By comparison, the VFD can vary the power and frequency to the motor, but with greater flexibility and fewer moving parts.

Because of the continuously increasing capabilities of solid-state power electronics, the pulse width modulation (PWM) VFD is becoming the drive of choice. It can work with motors that range in size from fractional to thousands of horsepower. It can also couple reliably, offer affordability in cost per horsepower and deliver measurable electrical energy savings.

Pages