A redesigned air-operated double diaphragm pump allows end users to reduce their energy costs.

Energy is the driving force behind global manufacturing today, and demand has increased exponentially with each generation. The global modern economy depends on its accessibility and, even more so, on its affordability.

This energy demand has generated an important discussion in the pump industry, and it begins with the increased cost of energy during the last decade. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the average consumer pays 47 percent more for electricity than they did 10 years ago. While many producers and consumers are aware of this fact, many accept it as part of the cost of doing business. The desire to decrease the end users’ cost of doing business motivated a diaphragm pump manufacturer’s team to develop a new line of pumps to meet this energy problem head-on.

Energy comes in many forms—liquid fuel, hydraulic, electrical and pneumatic. This article focuses on compressed air, which powers air-operated double diaphragm pumps (AODDP). AODDPs are used in many applications but are most commonly used in the transfer of fluid from one location to another. A basic assumption is a standard price for electricity of \$0.07 per kilowatt hour (kWh). Another assumption is that a 1-horsepower (hp) air compressor yields, on average, 4 standard cubic feet per minute (SCFM) of compressed air.

## Reading an AODDP Curve & Determining Operating Cost

To progress further into a discussion on the operating costs associated with compressed air usage in AODDPs, the proper way to read an AODDP pump curve must be understood. For a given operating condition, a pump curve conveys two important pieces of information:

• The flow rate in gallons per minute (gpm)
• What the air consumption rate will be in SCFM

Figure 1 depicts a standard 2-inch AODDP curve, based on the pump manufacturer’s design, before making significant improvements in its overall air consumption. Most AODDP manufacturers’ pump curves look comparable. In a pump curve, the horizontal axis denotes flow rate, and the vertical axis denotes pressure.

Figure 1. An illustration of a performance curve for a typical 2-inch AODDP

Identification of operating conditions (the pump’s input pressure and liquid discharge pressure) is a key step in reading a pump curve. Assume a standard AODDP experiences a maximum of 20 psi liquid discharge pressure during a basic transfer application and is operated by approximately 80 psig of air input pressure.

To read the pump curve in Figure 2, begin at the right of the vertical axis. Trace the curved blue 80 psig air inlet line until it intersects with the 20 psig horizontal line. The operating point of the pump is at this intersection—125 gpm at a rate of 118 SCFM. Using this information, a cost for operating the pump during a standard 8-hour day can be determined using the previously agreed upon standard air compressor yield and cost of electricity.

Figure 2. A pump curve reading at 80 psi at the air inlet and 20 psi of liquid discharge pressure

118 SCFM x 1 hp/4 SCFM = 29. 5 hp
29.5 hp x 0.746 kW/hp = 22 kW
22 kW x \$0.07/kWh = \$1.54 per hour

Based on these calculations and the assumed operating conditions, the pump costs \$1.54 per hour of operation; \$12.32 per day; \$61.60 per five-day work week; and \$3,203 per year. This average operating cost can easily be more than the initial purchase price of the AODDP. An installation rarely has only one AODDP—many installations can have up to 100 pumps. At \$3,203 each in annual operating costs, the pumps’ impact on the cost of doing business is significant.

An energy-efficient, 2-inch AODDP

## A More Efficient Solution

Recognizing the impact of the rising cost of energy on the cost of operating a standard AODDP, the pump manufacturer developed a line of pumps that would significantly reduce the end user’s cost of operation. This pump improves overall performance (with increased suction lift and flow rate) and uses less than half the compressed air of previous models.

Multiple modifications were made to its original design, including:

• Considerable reduction and optimization of “dead space” on the liquid and air side of the diaphragms
• An adjustment to the shift point of the main air valve to allow for a longer operating period during a more efficient point in the air valve’s cycle

Starting with a popular 26-year-old design, the AODDP manufacturer modified the shift point of its air valve, which resulted in a substantial improvement in overall energy consumption. On the earlier design, the pump was significantly less efficient near the end of the diaphragm stroke than it was at the beginning. Near the end of the stroke, the pump continued to consume large amounts of air but displaced progressively less fluid. By shifting the pump earlier in the cycle, the pump displaced slightly less fluid but used substantially less air. This yielded a dramatic improvement in overall air efficiency.

The shape of the diaphragm and the outer chamber were also optimized to reduce what is known as dead space. A pump has zero liquid dead space if the diaphragm, when fully extended, conforms 100-percent to the shape of the liquid chamber.

The optimized dead space on the liquid side of the diaphragm resulted in higher suction lift and higher displacement per stroke and yielded improved suction lift and a higher flow rate, respectively. Suction lift on the new design was increased from 13 feet-water to 24 feet-water, and the flow rate was improved from 155 gpm to 190 gpm.