In industrial business-to-business equipment markets, manufacturers are faced with an increasingly difficult operating environment. Energy price volatility, the increasing costs of regulatory compliance and public demands for improved environmental stewardship with regard to scarce resources are three prominent factors now impacting industrial organizations around the world.
.jpg)
The Challenge
Industrial manufacturers are facing an increasingly difficult business environment, one that is often impacted by these and other critical factors:- Energy-price volatility
- Regulatory compliance legislation and associated costs
- Public/customer expectations for enhanced resource stewardship
Energy-Price Volatility
Price volatility is defined in the energy industry as how quickly or widely electricity and/or natural gas prices change over a given time period. Prices are governed by supply and demand, where demand is impacted by factors such as weather patterns, economic conditions and consumer behavior. In recent years, price volatility has increased in the energy market. To protect against this volatility, many companies “hedge,” or buy, a commodity at a price that is locked in over a set period of time. While this may improve peace of mind for the operator, hedging is costly and doesn’t create value for the operator beyond reducing energy-cost volatility. The severity and potential impact of price volatility is such that in its 2015 report titled, “The New Normal,” the World Energy Council (WEC) said, “The uncertain impact of volatile energy and commodity prices […] has now established itself as the number-one issue for energy leaders worldwide.” The good news is that global energy leaders have recognized this challenge and are beginning to take measures to address it. According to Francois Moisan in WEC’s triennial 2016 report, “Energy Efficiency: A straight path towards energy sustainability,” the increase in energy-efficiency legislation around the world “signifies a strengthening and consolidation of the industrial commitment to energy efficiency.” The report does also indicate, however, that more “can and should be done to improve the efficiency of energy production and use.” This is noteworthy for industrial manufacturers because, as the WEC also points out, “industrial electric motors and electric motor-driven systems consume almost half of the total electricity and account for 70 percent of the total (amount of) electricity consumed in industry.” For many industrial companies where energy represents a significant portion of operating costs, price volatility will continue to be a challenge. These companies will be self-served to evaluate energy-saving technology, but will only reap the greatest rewards if they do so by taking into account the intricacies of equipment in the specific applications in which they operate. Only by developing and using the proper applications expertise will they be able to identify and choose the technology that is best suited to mitigate the cost risks associated with energy volatility.
Regulatory Compliance
Regulatory compliance is by definition a necessity for businesses in the modern world. These laws collectively shape the environment in which businesses operate. The number of federal regulations in the U.S. has been growing steadily for several decades, requiring more and more investments by many businesses in order to maintain compliance. In fact, a study by George Mason University shows that “the effects of federal regulation on value added to the (U.S.) GDP for a panel of 22 industries…over a period of 35 years…dampened (GDP by approximately) 0.8 percent per year since 1980, eliminating $4 trillion in growth by 2012.” Two prominent examples in the industrial-manufacturing universe are the motor-efficiency regulations that have been developed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) in Europe. The bottom line is that regulations are an unavoidable requirement for doing business in almost any jurisdiction in the world. Many advances in technology have been geared toward meeting the demands of a stricter regulatory environment (See Sidebar: Motoring Ahead), but will be optimized only if they are applied with the appropriate applications expertise. For example, the misapplication of a pump (for example, incorrectly sizing the pump for its application) will likely lead to far greater energy consumption than can be saved from improvements in motor technology.Expectations for Resource Stewardship
A phrase that has gained stature over the past two decades in all forms of business is “corporate social responsibility,” or CSR, which is commonly characterized as “business practices involving initiatives that benefit society.”
Motoring Ahead
The evolving design and operation of motors presents a specific example of how next-generation technology helps manufacturers lower energy use, meet environmental-responsibility thresholds and reduce costs.
To address the operation of motors, the International Energy Agency (IEA) created the Energy Efficiency End-Use Equipment (4E) working group, which includes 12 countries: Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, France, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the U.S.
In late 2015, the 4E group released a study, “Energy efficiency roadmap for electric motors and motor systems,” that indicated that since 1995, “efficient motors have gained an increasing share of the global market, assisted by a framework of international standards that classifies motors according to their energy efficiency.”
Motors were placed in one of four classifications – E0 (least efficient), E1, E2 and E3 (most efficient) – which created a common technical platform that underpins national policies that are targeted at increasing the implementation of high-efficiency motors in manufacturing operations. The four classifications form the basis of minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) that are now inherent to most advanced economies, as well as to
many developing nations. The global sales of motors that fall into the two most-efficient classifications—E2 and E3—accounted for roughly 70 percent of all motor sales in 2015, after standing at less than 10 percent of
market share in 1995.
This is significant because the IEA expects the market for motors to expand by 2.5 percent annually through 2019, which will create opportunities for further introduction of higher-efficiency motors into both mature and developing regions. However, as the IEA notes, the impact of more efficient motors on overall market efficiency is gradual due to the motor’s extended operational lifetime. To speed up the increase in overall efficiency, several countries are considering regulations that will enforce MEPS by encouraging the early retirement of inefficient motors.