The concept of “suction energy” was developed to enhance the evaluation of the NPSH characteristics of centrifugal pumps, but I fear that it misses the mark. Suction energy is defined as the product of U1 (the peripheral velocity of the impeller eye) and S (suction specific speed). At first blush, that seems like a reasonable concept, but a mathematical analysis seems to indicate a flaw in the logic. The equation for suction energy is:
Es = U1 x S (1)
Es = suction energy
U1 = peripheral velocity of impeller eye, ft./sec.
S = suction specific speed (rpm-gpm-ft.)
The equation for S, suction specific speed, is:
S = N√Q / (NPSHr)0.75 (2)
N = rotative speed of impeller, rev./min.
Q = capacity of one eye at best-efficiency-point, US gal./min.
NPSHr = net positive suction head, normally at 3 percent head drop (of first stage), feet
Using the “Classic” Relation Between NPSHr And U1
As shown in Reference 1, at no-prerotation capacity (which is at, or near, the best efficiency point—BEP), NPSHr can be expressed by the following equation:
NPSHr = U12/2g [(K1 + K2) tan2 β1 + K2] (3)
g = gravitational constant, 32.2 ft./sec.2
K1 and K2 = experimental constants, established by test
β1 = inlet vane angle, normally measured at the shroud, degrees
Everything on the right side of Equation 3 can be considered constant, except for U1. We can, therefore, say that:
NPSHr = K3U12 (4)
Solving for U1:
U1 = [NPSHr/K3]0.5 (5)
If we plug Equations 2 and 5 into Equation 1, we get:
Es = [ 1/K3]0.5[ N√Q / (NPSHr)0.25] (7)
The effect of NPSH on the characteristic has been significantly reduced, with the exponent dropping from 0.75 to 0.25, a two-thirds reduction. We’ve almost eliminated NPSH from the equation, and that should not happen. NPSH is what it is all about.
If we envision suction specific speed as a stool supported by three legs, with each leg being (NPSHr)0.25, then multiplying by U1 cuts off two of the legs.
I prefer to sit on a stool that has three legs.